Waste to Value: Modeling the Cost of Urban Consumer Waste and the Economic Potential of Circular Economy Strategies: An Empirical Cross-Country Analysis

Abstract:

This study examines the economic potential of resource-efficient waste strategies in tackling urban waste challenges. With global municipal solid waste (MSW) projected to surpass 3.8 billion tons annually by 2050, urgent action is required. Circular approaches like recycling, reuse, and resale are proposed solutions, yet their economic impacts are underexplored, especially across different countries. The research offers a comparative cost-benefit analysis of material recovery approaches in Germany, India, and South Korea. By evaluating the direct costs of linear waste systems versus the value recoverable through circular alternatives, the study seeks to provide valuable insights to help policymakers transition to more sustainable and economically effective waste management frameworks.

 

Introduction:

The rapid growth of urban populations, rising consumption, and inadequate waste management infrastructure have triggered a global waste crisis. Municipal solid waste (MSW) is expected to reach 3.8 billion tons annually by 2050, placing a substantial strain on cities (World Bank, 2023). Traditional linear waste systems, reliant on the “take-make-dispose” model, have proven unsustainable, contributing to increased landfill use, lost material value, and higher carbon emissions (Moorthy et al., 2025). As a response, the circular economy (CE) has garnered attention for its potential to reduce waste and reclaim economic value through strategies like reuse, recycling, and extending product lifecycles. Circular models are increasingly incorporated into international frameworks, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 12).

​

However, despite growing discourse on CE, empirical research on its economic benefits in urban waste systems remains limited. Most existing studies focus on recycling rates or overlook critical behavioral and policy factors that influence the success of CE across diverse socioeconomic contexts. This research addresses this gap by conducting a comparative, empirical cost-benefit analysis of resource-efficient waste strategies in Germany, India, and South Korea, nations with varying levels of CE maturity and urban infrastructure. The study models the economic costs of traditional urban consumer waste systems and simulates the potential value recaptured from circular alternatives, integrating data on consumer behavior, informal sector participation, policy mechanisms (e.g., PAYT/VBRS), and environmental externalities (e.g., carbon pricing). By quantifying these complex factors, the research offers a policy-relevant framework for municipalities to transition to more sustainable and economically efficient waste systems. It also emphasizes the economic opportunities embedded in material recovery approaches. The central research question is: How do CE strategies like reuse, resale, recycling, and behavioral pricing mechanisms impact the economic cost of urban consumer waste, and what value can be recaptured through these frameworks in Germany, India, and South Korea?

​

Literature Review:

The circular economy (CE) has gained momentum globally as a response to unsustainable linear consumption models, especially in urban waste management. CE strategies aim to retain the value of materials through recycling, reuse, and behavioral change, but their economic modeling and implementation vary widely across national contexts. Germany’s CE system is among the most advanced, supported by policies like Extended Producer Responsibility and dual-bin collection systems. These initiatives have achieved high recycling rates, but studies often lack dynamic economic modeling to evaluate their performance under changing market and policy conditions (Jeevitha & Amaleshwari, 2023). South Korea’s Volume-Based Rate System (VBRS) effectively reduces waste through pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) pricing. India’s urban waste landscape is dominated by an informal sector that processes up to 60% of recyclables. While its contributions are socially and economically vital, they are often excluded from formal economic models and policy planning (Kala & Bolia, 2024). Across contexts, most CE studies prioritize environmental performance over financial viability. Comparative cross-national analyses are rare, and few incorporate behavioral economics, data infrastructure, or informal sector integration. There is a growing recognition that both top-down policy and bottom-up innovation are essential for a just CE transition (Maletić, 2023).

 

Methodology:​ 

This study employs a comparative, mixed-method approach. A three-phase analytical framework will be used:

Phase I models baseline costs of the linear “take-make-dispose” system using data on municipal expenditures, landfill maintenance, and environmental externalities.

Phase II simulates circular economy scenarios, including reuse, resale, recycling, and waste-to-resource systems by incorporating carbon pricing, market values of recovered materials, and consumer participation rates.

Phase III conducts a cross-country comparison to assess the economic feasibility, behavioral responsiveness, and policy effectiveness of CE transitions across varied income and infrastructure settings.

​

The analysis will draw on secondary data sources such as Eurostat, the German Federal Environment Agency, South Korea’s Ministry of Environment, India’s CPCB and SWaCH, and global datasets from the World Bank and Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Key variables include waste treatment costs, carbon emissions, diversion rates, health-related externalities, and compliance with behavioral incentives like Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) and Volume-Based Rate Systems (VBRS).

​

A cost-benefit model will be applied using shadow pricing and scenario simulation to quantify economic impacts. The model will estimate both the cost burden of current linear systems and the potential value recovery from circular strategies. By integrating behavioral economics and fiscal performance across national contexts, this study aims to offer actionable, data-driven insights to inform urban waste policy and accelerate sustainable circular transitions.

 

Conclusion:

This research will provide insight into how circular economic strategies, when combined with analytics and behavioral insights, can reduce waste costs and unlock untapped financial value. To realize this potential, policymakers must invest in digital infrastructure, targeted interventions, and comparative models like those presented here. Doing so will not only improve system efficiency but also accelerate progress toward global sustainability goals.

​

References :

1. Bogusz, M., Matysik-Pejas, R., Krasnodębski, A., & Dziekański, P. (2023). Sustainable consumption of households according to the zero waste concept. Energies, 16(18), 6516. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186516

 

2. Jeevitha, R., & Amaleshwari, U. (2023). Circular practices in India. BOHR International Journal of Advances in Management Research, 2(1), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.54646/bijamr.2023.24

 

3. Kala, K., & B. Bolia, N. (n.d.). Empowering the informal sector in urban waste management: Towards a Comprehensive Waste Management Policy for India. Science Direct, 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.100968

 

4. Moorthy, D., Akila, M., & J, C. J. (2025). Circular Economy and Green Marketing: A path toward Zero-Waste Consumerism. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.3423

​

5. Sambyal, S. S. (2023). Social Innovation for the circular Economy: an example of informal waste recycling. In CRC Press eBooks (pp. 53–72). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003201816-4

​

6. Ungerman, O., & Dědková, J. (2024). Consumer behavior in the model of the circular economy in the field of handling discarded items. PLoS ONE, 19(3), e0300707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300707

 

7. World Bank Group. (2023). Solid waste management. In World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-management

​